Medical Fact-Check Protocol for Urology Writers
Stop publishing unverified claims. This guide gives you a reusable 15-minute fact-checking workflow, vetted source lists (NIH, AUA, peer-reviewed journals), and the red-flag phrases that signal weak sourcing, so editors trust your first drafts and your publisher's credibility stays intact.
2,649 words · Instant download · AI-assisted content
What's Inside
- Urology-Specific Source Vetting: What Actually Counts as Authoritative
- Red Flags in Medical Claims: Marketing Disguised as Education
- AMA/Chicago Citation Shortcuts for Healthcare Writers
- How to Read Medical Studies Without a PhD
- Fact-Checking Workflow: Complete 15-Minute Protocol
Red Flag Pattern #1: The Unnamed Statistic Claim: "Studies show that 70% of men experience erectile dysfunction by age 60." What to do: Reject it. Demand the specific study. AUA guidelines cite ED prevalence at 26% at age 40, 40% at age 60. The "70%" often comes from a single pharmaceutical company study with narrow population criteria. Action: Search "[specific claim] + urology + NIH" before accepting. If you can't find it in three minutes, the writer is paraphrasing marketing copy.
$12.00
One-time purchase — instant download
Buy Now — $12.0030-day money-back guarantee. If it doesn't deliver value, reply to your receipt for a full refund.